
Since the New York Times wrote its hacker story, I have been fascinated with this “weev” character for both professional and personal reasons. The story was full of jounalism code like “claimed” and “boasted.” When a journalist, even a feature writer, deviates from the good old “said” or “stated” to use words like that, he is sowing doubt about his subject.
Unlike other feature writers, who have taken punks like this at face value, Mattathias Schwartz used those words to strongly signal that he thinks weev is full of shit. He signaled again when a Rolls Royce appeared in a strip mall parking lot, and weev called it ”my car.” Schwartz wryly wrote, “And it was, for that night and the next, at least.” Schwartz also took pains to mention that he always met weev at the train station and that it took a month before weev found Schwartz’s social security number. I’m thinking weev had to scrape together $50 for a Choicepoint report. Schwartz also theorizes that weev’s digs were actually his girlfriend’s.
This is not the first time weev has been called out for spewing sheer bull. If Google Video is to be believed, “weev” was once Andrew Wbeelsoi (Weevlos?), whose sole claim to fame in the real world was giving a talk at a hacker conference in SanFran two years ago with his inarticulate douche friend Mischa Spiegelmock. Pseudonyms? I hope so. At any rate, the two claimed to have hacked Firefox in 30 ways, only to have their claims debunked. After giving a drug-fueled public speech about using a bot net to create an underground market for assassination, drugs and whatnot, weev got worked over by two FBI agents and scared shitless, as the story goes.
Now weev trolls the web pseudonymously, and, despite his rant about bloggers in the pages of the Times, he little squirt actually runs a precious Live Journal blog in which he recycles Nazi propaganda and Ayn Rand philosophy in a toxic, malliable mix that justifies his parasitic lifestyle. What cracked me up the most about his blog – aside from the messianic complex, false arrogance and fluffy, SoCal take on Social Darwinism – was his absolute failure to recognize (or acknowledge?) that he just got owned by the NYT. His words:
“I while ago I met with Matt Schwartz from the New York Times Magazine, under the explicit condition that I would be covering philosophy and history and not my personal business. I feel I didn’t really get what I want out of this exchange, as the important philosophy I conveyed to him was only conveyed in short bits that I think were taken out of context.”
That, weev, is because Schwartz quickly sized you up as a blowhard freak and decided to get some frequent flier mileage out of you. Over at Something Awful, weev’s claims are being roundly ridiculed in this thread as well. But Corrupt.org, which appears to be the vanity project of one Alex Birch, has given weev a soapbox.